Investment Planning

India is gaining importance in the field of investment day by day. There are so many factors that favor the investment in India and attract the potential investors from all over the world. India has got the strong strength of technical and scientific population. The domestic market of India is very vast. The English language base of India is also very strong. The small scale sector is also very good for investment planning in India. The infrastructure of the country also supports the investment planning in India. Most these things together create a very healthy atmosphere for investment in India. The investment sector of India has emerged as a great wealth creator. In fact it has been termed as the world’s fastest growing creator of wealth.

Investment means putting your money to work to earn more money. Done wisely, it can help you meet your financial goals like buying a new house, paying for college education of your children, of your enjoying a comfortable retirement, or whatever is important to you.

You do not have to be wealthy to be an investor. Investing even a small amount can produce considerable rewards over the long-term, especially if you do it regularly. But you need to decide about how much you want to invest and where. To choose wisely, you need to know the investment options thoroughly and their relative risk exposures.

There are many Indian companies that have crossed the net profit of the last yr in a period of six months. This in turn accelerates the corporate earnings of the country. The government of India also frames such rules and regulations so as to attract investors from all over the world to invest in India. There are so many NRI’s that are investing their money in the market of India. The government of India is taking all the steps to promote investment planning in India.

The choice of a financial planning advisor can be a difficult task. It becomes even more difficult in case you have no knowledge about financing. You must select your financial planning advisor with great care and should hire some one only after making a proper research for that person. Before hiring someone as financial planning advisor you should first of all discuss it with your friends and family as it is also possible that any one from your own contacts may have some knowledge about some good financial planning advisor. You should also check the educational background and the past history of the advisor that you want to hire.

The financial planning advisor plays a very important role in the investment planning in India. You can also take the service of the agencies that hire such financial planning advisors. You should always keep it in mind that a bad advisor may ruin all your finances and may fall you in great trouble. You can pay the advisors on the basis of hours of work or on monthly basis. But you should also make it sure that you are not paying too much for financial planning. The financial planning advisor that we choose should be able to deal with all our debts and should also save us some money. The financial planning advisors play a great role in the financial planning of the business. The important thing is to hire the service of a good financial planning advisor and at reasonable place.

raddiinvestorEducationstock markets, investment, nifty, tax savingsindia investment Planning – Part 22011-06-08T17:43:08. 000Z2012-05-01T18:20:42. 000Zwww. Wisdominwealthmanagement. Com Understand fixed income financial planning from the leaders of institutional investment. We also discuss the future of the municipal bond market and fixed income markets. Professional Planning Services manages a wide spectrum of financial service products. Larry Passaretti and Gregory Cobb (Boyd Watterson) discusses the investment strategies and processes provided by Professional Planning Services.


Online Mba Programs

Due to work/family time issues, I’m thinking of doing an online MBA vs. Traditional. After much soul searching, I feel that is the best option if I want to fulfill a lifelong dream of getting my MBA. I detest entrance exams, though – are there any online MBA programs that do not require the GMAT. After speaking to others on the web, I found the answer. You get what you pay for. Would you go to a doctor that got his degree on line? On-line MBA’s are scams. They are not worth the money and it will not get you anywhere in life.

Via ViolentAndYoung. Com – The Top 20 MBA Business School Programs within the combined rankings of BusinessWeek, Economist, Financial Times, and US News. The methodology is as follows: for each ranking publication, the #1 MBA program receives 20 points, the #2 19 points, #3 18 points, and so on. The points are stacked to provide a comprehensive look at America’s top MBA programs. They are (in order): Harvard Business School, University of Chicago Booth, Stanford Graduate School of Business, University of Pennsylvania Wharton, Northwestern University Kellogg, MIT Sloan, Columbai University, Dartmouth College Tuck, University of California Berkeley Haas, NYU Stern, University of Michigan Ross, Duke University Fuqua, University of Virginia Darden, Yale, Cornell University Johnson, UCLA Anderson, Carnegie Mellon University Tepper, Indiana University Kelley, University of Washington, and University of North Carolina. Top 20 MBA Programs Comprehensive Business School Rankings were completed by ViolentAndYoung. Com. To notice the full post and interactive graphs please visit: violentandyoung. Com All MBA school images are from Google I’mages, and are copyright by their respective owners. Please contact me if you would often be listed for credit for your photo. Thank you.


Online Phd Programs

Obtaining degrees via online programs has become an extremely popular way of getting an education. It allows flexibility, and can also be more enjoyable for some as well as more affordable. Undergraduate and even Master’s programs that are offered online don’t seem so different from on-campus programs, especially since some programs combine online and campus classes. However, when it comes to PhDs, it is a whole different story. Doctorate degrees consist of a great deal of research, papers and fewer classes and courses like the other degree programs demand. How does this affect getting a PhD through an online program and how can one actually benefit from such a program more than a campus-based one?

Many unthinkable tasks have been made possible through the Internet, and earning a PhD and various Doctorate degrees is one of them. More and more schools are offering online PhD programs that allow students the ease of pursuing a higher education without having to give up their jobs. Courses are offered online, and some programs also require a few campus-based courses as well. Such programs are mainly known as “Blended” programs. Students can receive online mentoring from the school or university’s faculty members in order to help conduct their research for their papers and dissertations, just like they would were they to join a campus-based PhD program.

The downside of online PhD programs is that not all programs are offered and that not all online PhD programs are offered by every college and university that offers online PhD programs. However, as time goes by, additional programs are being added, making it easier to find an online PhD program for your field of study. Another downside is that there is less face-to-face dialogue between student and instructor; however, this does not have to be the case. As mentioned earlier, students can or may have to combine online courses with campus courses. The benefits of only PhD programs exceed the shortcoming by far. Online programs can be easily tailored to fit into a working individual’s schedule so that the studies do not interfere with work, or family life. Many students who thought their busy lives would prevent them from obtaining their PhDs have been proven wrong by the growing amount of online post-graduate programs that are available today.

Matt Morton, British Council International Student of the Year 2009, talks about getting a PhD in the UK from an American perspective


Financial Advisor

There is a simple but undeniable truth in the financial consulting and wealth planning industry that Wall Street has kept as a “dirty little secret” for years. That dirty little, and nearly always overlooked secret is THE WAY YOUR FINANCIAL ADVISOR IS PAID DIRECTLY AFFECTS THEIR FINANCIAL ADVICE TO YOU!

You want, and deserve (and consequently SHOULD EXPECT) unbiased financial advice in your best interests. But the fact is 99% of the general investing public has no idea how their financial advisor is compensated for the advice they provide. This is a tragic oversight, yet an all too common one. There are three basic compensation models for financial advisors – commissions based, fee-based, and fee-only.

Commission Based Financial Advisor – These advisors sell “loaded” or commission paying products like insurance, annuities, and loaded mutual funds. The commission your financial advisor is earning on your transaction may or may not be disclosed to you. I say “transaction” because that’s what commission based financial advisors do – they facilitate TRANSACTIONS. Once the transaction is over, you may be lucky to hear from them again because they’ve already earned the bulk of whatever commission they were going to earn.

Since these advisors are paid commissions which may or may not be disclosed, and the amounts may vary based on the insurance and investment products they sell, there is an inherent conflict of interest in the financial advice given to you and the commission these financial advisors earn. If their income is dependent on transactions and selling insurance and investment products, THEY HAVE A FINANCIAL INCENTIVE TO SELL YOU WHATEVER PAYS THEM THE HIGHEST COMMISSION! That’s not to say there aren’t any honest and ethical commission based advisors, but clearly this identifies a conflict of interest.

Fee Based Financial Advisor – Here’s the real “dirty little secret” Wall Street doesn’t want you to know about. Wall Street (meaning the firms and organizations involved in buying, selling, or managing assets, insurance and investments) has sufficiently blurred the lines between the three ways your financial advisor may be compensated that 99% of the investing public believes that hiring a Fee-Based Financial Advisor is directly correlated with “honest, ethical and unbiased” financial advice.

The truth is FEE-BASED MEANS NOTHING! Think about it (you’ll understand more when you learn the third type of compensation), all fee-BASED means is that your financial advisor can take fees AND commissions from selling insurance and investment products! So a “base” of their compensation may be tied to a percentage of the assets they manage on your behalf, then the “icing on the cake” is the commission income they can potentially earn by selling you commission driven investment and insurance products.

Neat little marketing trick right? Lead off with the word “Fee” so the general public thinks the compensation model is akin to the likes of attorney’s or accountants, then add the word “based” after it to cover their tails when these advisors sell you products for commissions!

FEE ONLY Financial Advisor – By far, the most appropriate and unbiased way to get financial advice is through a FEE-ONLY financial advisor. I stress the word “ONLY”, because a truly fee ONLY financial advisor CAN NOT, and WILL NOT accept commissions in any form. A Fee-ONLY financial advisor earns FEES in the form of hourly compensation, project financial planning, or a percentage of assets managed on your behalf.

All fees are in black and white, there are no hidden forms of compensation! Fee-Only financial advisors believe in FULL DISCLOSURE of any potential conflicts of interest in their compensation and the financial advice and guidance provided to you.

Understanding the conflict of interest in the financial advice given by commission based brokers enables you to clearly identify the conflict of interest for fee-based financial advisors also – they earn fees AND commissions! Hence – FEE-BASED MEANS NOTHING! There is only one true way to get the most unbiased, honest and ethical advice possible and that is through a financial advisor who believes in, and practices, full disclosure.

Commission and Fee-Based financial advisors typically don’t believe in or practice full-disclosure, because the sheer magnitude of the the fees the average investor/consumer pays would surely make them think twice.

Consider for a moment you need to buy a truck specifically for towing and hauling heavy loads. You go to the local Ford dealership and talk to a salesperson – that salesperson asks what type of vehicle you’re interested in and shows you their line of trucks. Of course, to that salesperson who earns a commission when you buy a truck – ONLY FORD has the right truck for you. It’s the best, it’s the only way to go, and if you don’t buy that truck from that salesperson you’re crazy!

The fact is Toyota makes great trucks, GM makes great trucks, Dodge makes great trucks. The Ford may or may not be the best truck for your needs, but the salesperson ONLY shows you the Ford, because that’s ALL the salesperson can sell you and make a commission from.

This is similar to a commission based financial advisor. If they sell annuities, they’ll show you annuities. If they sell mutual funds, all they’ll show you is commission paying mutual funds. If they sell life insurance, they’ll tell you life insurance is the solution to all of your financial problems. The fact is, when all you have is a hammer. . . everything looks like a nail!

Now consider for a moment you hired a car buying advisor and paid them a flat fee. That advisor is an expert and stays current on all of the new vehicles. That advisor’s only incentive is to find you the most appropriate truck for you, the one that hauls the most, tows the best, and is clearly the best option available. They earn a fee for their service, so they want you to be happy and refer your friends and family to them. They even have special arrangements worked out with all of the local car dealerships to get you the best price on the truck that’s right for you because they want to add value to your relationship with them.

The analogy of a “car buying advisor” is similar to a Fee-Only financial planner. Fee-Only financial advisor’s use the best available investments with the lowest possible cost. A Fee-Only financial advisor’s only incentive is to keep you happy, to earn your trust, to provide the best possible financial advice and guidance using the most appropriate investment tools and planning practices.

So on one hand you have a car salesperson who’s going to earn a commission (coincidentally the more you pay for the truck the more they earn!) to sell you one of the trucks off their lot. On the other hand, you have a trusted car buying advisor who shops all of the vehicles to find the most appropriate one for your specific needs, and then because of his relationships with all of the car dealers can also get you the best possible price on that vehicle. Which would you prefer?

Truly unbiased financial advice and guidance comes in the form of Fee-Only financial planning. You know exactly what you’re paying and what you’re getting in return for the compensation your Fee-Only financial advisor earns. Everything is in black and white, and there are no hidden agenda’s or conflicts of interest in the advice given to you by a true Fee-Only financial advisor!

The fact is unfortunately less than 1% of all financial advisor professionals are truly FEE-ONLY. The reason for this? There’s a clear and substantial disparity in a financial advisor’s income generated through commissions (or commissions and fees), and the income a financial advisor earns through the Fee-Only model:

Example #1 – You just changed employment and you’re rolling over a $250,000 401k into an IRA. The commission based advisor may sell you a variable annuity in your IRA (which is a very poor planning tactic in most cases and for many reasons) and earn a 5% (or many times more) commission ($12,500) and get an ongoing, or “trailer” commission of 1% (plus or minus) equal to $2,500 per year. The Fee-Only financial advisor may charge you a fee for retirement plan, an hourly fee, or a percentage of your portfolio to manage it. Let’s say in this case you pay a $500 retirement plan fee and 1. 25% of assets managed (very common for a Fee-Only financial advisor in this situation). That advisor earns $500 plus $3,125 ($250,000 * 1. 25%) or TOTAL COMPENSATION of $3,625 – FAR LESS THAN THE $15,000 THE COMMISSION (or Fee-Based) financial advisor earned! In fact it takes the Fee-Only financial advisor over four years to earn what the commission (or fee-based) advisor earned in one year!

Example #2 – You’re retired and managing a $750,000 nest egg which needs to provide you income for the rest of your life. A fee-based financial advisor may recommend putting $400,000 into an single premium immediate annuity to get you income and the other $350,000 into a fee-based managed mutual fund platform. The annuity may pay a commission of 4% or $16,000 and the fee-based managed mutual fund portfolio may cost 1. 25% for total compensation of $20,375 first year (not including the “trailer” commissions). The Fee-Only advisor would possibly shop low load annuities for you, possibly put the entire portfolio into a managed account, possibly look at municipal bonds, or any other variety of options available. It’s hard to say how much the Fee-Only advisor would earn as their largest incentive is to keep you the client happy, and provide the best planning advice and guidance possible for your situation. BUT, in this case let’s just assume that a managed mutual fund portfolio was implemented with an averaged cost of 1% (very common for that level of assets), so the Fee-Only financial advisor earns roughly $7,500 per year and it takes that financial advisor THREE YEARS to earn what the fee-based financial advisor earned in ONE YEAR!

The prior examples are very common in today’s financial advisory industry. It’s unfortunate that such a disparity in income exists between the compensation models, or there would likely be many more truly independent and unbiased Fee-Only financial advisors today!

Now consider for a moment which financial advisor will work harder for you AFTER the initial consultations an planning? Which financial advisor must consistently earn your trust and add value to your financial and investment planning? It’s obvious the financial advisor with the most to lose is the Fee-Only advisor. A Fee-Only financial advisor has a direct loss of income on a regular basis from losing a client.

The commission or fee-based financial advisor however has little to lose. You can fire them after they’ve put you in their high commission products, and as you can see from the examples they’ve already made the majority of the commissions they are going to make on you as a client. They have little to gain by continuing to add value to your financial and investment planning, and little to lose by losing you as a client.

Wouldn’t you prefer a financial advisory model where your financial advisor must continually earn your trust and add consistent value to your planning?

It’s clearly more difficult to earn a living and run a profitable financial advisory firm through the Fee-Only financial planning and guidance model. For this reason, most financial advisors take the easy way and sell products for commissions and charge fees on assets managed – that way they can make a nice living on your investment portfolio and still have an ongoing stream of revenue every year. For this reason also, less than 1% of financial advisors are truly Fee-Only, yet it’s that 1% that is truly objective and unbiased, and that 1% whose only incentive is to manage your financial plan, investments, and overall wealth to accomplish the goals you wish to achieve!

The real “dirty little secret” Wall St. has is the undeniable truth that the commission and fee-based financial advisory model has inherent conflicts of interest, and your advisor may be “selling you investment products” rather than “solving your financial problems”!